• PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    • IN SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMS
    • PRINCIPAL AND SCHOOL LEADER DEVELOPMENT
    • MIDDLE LEADERS PROGRAM
  • STEM LEARNING
    • IGNITING STEM LEARNING BOOK – DR ADRIAN BERTOLINI
    • DESIGN YOUR STEM PROGRAMME
  • WEBINARS
    • EVENT CALENDAR
  • WHO WE ARE
  • GET IN TOUCH
  • PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    • IN SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMS
    • PRINCIPAL AND SCHOOL LEADER DEVELOPMENT
    • MIDDLE LEADERS PROGRAM
  • STEM LEARNING
    • IGNITING STEM LEARNING BOOK – DR ADRIAN BERTOLINI
    • DESIGN YOUR STEM PROGRAMME
  • WEBINARS
    • EVENT CALENDAR
  • WHO WE ARE
  • GET IN TOUCH

Avoiding Shotgun Learning

  • On 31-01-2013

Quite often, developing powerful and meaningful key understandings is an area that teachers struggle with as they create and plan authentic rich task units. This is a critical step that many teachers can gloss over in planning but can make a profound difference to having clear, powerful units that provide great learning opportunities.

What we have experienced when teachers have begun the process of extracting “understandings” from the Australian Curriculum (or any curriculum documentation for that matter) what results is a long list of statements, understandings, and facts being written down. This is an important step in the process but it is not the final step. Quite often it is treated as a final step because the teachers themselves are used to teaching students “knowledge” rather than having the students learn. This is a consequence of the Industrial Education paradigm that has existed in our society for the past 200 years. If the teachers just use the lengthy list of “understandings” in their planning documentation without sequencing the “understandings” into a coherent and consistent whole, then there is a subtle but long reaching impact.

What we have found is that teachers take this mass of “understandings” and, with the mindset of they have to “cover” all this and make sure the students “learn” this, crowd the unit with too much material. All of this is with the hope that the students will gain the “understandings” articulated in their planning documents. This is shotgun learning.  This approach fundamentally undermines the opportunity students can gain to frame their understanding inside a powerful context. If we, as a teaching profession, want to develop students to be performance oriented in their learning, we must first clearly and logically articulate what we are intending the students to understand and what skills they are to develop and then align the learning to accomplish those goals.

Key understandings are created to clearly define the purpose of the learning within the unit. They articulate the fundamental deep learning that the unit is being created to achieve. The key understandings not only have the scope of addressing what the Australian Curriculum achievement standards require to be understood, but also the passion and self-expression of the teaching team, as well as the values and expression of the school.

Clear key understandings will allow teachers to create authentic essential / fat / fertile questions that can be used to guide and challenge student thinking in particular directions. The sequence of understandings also allow for an authentic and meaningful sequence of learning throughout the unit. Teachers and students alike will actually know what they are fundamentally out to learn in the unit and what would indicate successfully achieving that understanding.

The following document highlight the process and the thinking behind designing powerful key understandings as well as the overall process to creating great authentic rich-task units that allow for differentiation and student centred learning. The document includes a range of actual teacher designed examples from Grade 1 through to Year 10.

Download Designing Key Understandings

0 Comments

Leave Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts
  • Cooperation vs Collaboration School Leadership
  • Part III – A Framework for Developing Teachers
  • Part II – A Framework for Developing Teachers
  • A Framework for Developing Teachers Part I
  • From Vision to Leadership in School
Archives
  • March 2020
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • August 2009

Team Teaching and Project-Based Learning

Bullied Children Can Suffer Lasting Psychological Harm as Adults

Scroll

Where we work

  • We work with schools and organisations across Australia. If you are in WA, VIC, TAS, QLD, SA, NT, NSW or New Zealand we have multiple delivery options available to suit.
  • Are you outside of these locations? Get in touch to discuss how our Bespoke Professional Learning can be applied.

Contact Us

  • Dr Adrian Bertolini - Director of Learning
    Email: adrian@intuyuconsulting.com.au
    Phone: +61 0413 036 382
  • Rachel Manneke-Jones - Office Administration
    E: rachel@intuyuconsulting.com.au
    P: +61 0411 270 277

Stay Connected

SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES

© 2024 Intuyu Consulting Pty Ltd