• PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    • IN SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMS
    • PRINCIPAL AND SCHOOL LEADER DEVELOPMENT
    • MIDDLE LEADERS PROGRAM
  • STEM LEARNING
    • IGNITING STEM LEARNING BOOK – DR ADRIAN BERTOLINI
    • DESIGN YOUR STEM PROGRAMME
  • WEBINARS
    • EVENT CALENDAR
  • WHO WE ARE
  • GET IN TOUCH
  • PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    • IN SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMS
    • PRINCIPAL AND SCHOOL LEADER DEVELOPMENT
    • MIDDLE LEADERS PROGRAM
  • STEM LEARNING
    • IGNITING STEM LEARNING BOOK – DR ADRIAN BERTOLINI
    • DESIGN YOUR STEM PROGRAMME
  • WEBINARS
    • EVENT CALENDAR
  • WHO WE ARE
  • GET IN TOUCH

Moving from Teacher Centred to Learner Driven Learning

  • On 13-08-2014

I have been having a lot of interesting presentations at schools lately where I have been brought in to work with the teachers on formative assessment or differentiation or backward planning or some other pedagogical or curriculum strategy with the aim of building teacher capacity to create great learning environments.

One of my key messages is that there is an underlying context that the teachers and the school really need to grapple with if they are going to be successful at enacting any of these strategies.

If they want the new approach to succeed they have to shift not only their pedagogical and curriculum planning practices but their entire context about learning

Different contexts of learning and the perception of who is responsible for learning creates different actions, habits and even use of language for both teachers (lead learners) and students (learners). I have discussed the importance of habits and structures in earlier posts (here, here and here) but on this occasion I want to point out that different contexts makes some things easier, some things more challenging, and require different expectations, behaviours and strategies to make them work.

For example, I have been sharing the following table in many of my presentations of late to highlight to teachers this exact point. I developed it after seeing the Stages of Personalized Learning Environments Chart by Barbara Bray & Kathleen McClaskey.

Teacher Centred Environment Learner Centred Environment

Learner Driven Environment

  • High Effort by Teacher
  • Passive Learners
  • Low motivation
  • Low Resilience
  • Low learner responsibility
  • High content focus
  • Low skill development focus
  • Differentiation is driven by teacher and hard work
  • Teachers perceive they need to cover the curriculum, they need to make sure students learn what is in the curriculum (teachers own the learning)
  • High Effort up front by Teacher focused on developing the scaffolding (low/medium effort during learning)
  • Co-construct learning with learners
  • Growing Active Learners
  • Varying motivation
  • Developing Resilience
  • Increasing Learner Responsibility
  • Focus on developing skills in preference to just delivering content
  • Differentiation is beginning to become automatic within learning as the learning activities become rich learning tasks
  • Backward planning is critical
  • Low Effort by Teacher and that effort is focused on focusing the learners into the right directions or the most effective learning – more of a coach, facilitator model
  • Learners drive learning according to their needs
  • Active Learners
  • High Motivation
  • High Resilience
  • Learners are responsible
  • High skills of learning required
  • Differentiation is automatic – students differentiate for themselves
  • Learners own the learning

Now I am not saying that learning should not be teacher centred at times. Direct Instruction, which is a teacher centred strategy, has been shown to be a statistically significant approach to developing learners. However, it is when we get stuck in one context that problems arise. As you move from left to right in the table the skill level  and depth necessary for the students to learn increases. A learner driven environment requires learners to have higher order skills quite often identified as 21st Century competencies. You will in fact find that the best academically performing students display many of the learner driven behaviours and drive their own learning despite what is happening in their classes.

However I want to point out that if a teacher and a school has not structured its learning environment, and planned in a coherent and cohesive way to develop students to be driving their learning through the years of being at the school, then they are not fulfilling their purpose as an educational institution. Whilst it was passable in some ways to have teacher centred learning in the past this is no longer the case. For the constantly changing world we are preparing learners for, it is critical that they develop the capacity to drive their own learning. Unless we are focused on creating the opportunities for this to occur then we fail as educators and educational institutions.

Teacher Centred to Learner Driven

For more research and reading around this topic check out:

  • The New Pedagogy- Students and Teachers as Learning Partners (Michael Fullan)
  • An Essential Question for Developing Student-Centered Classrooms (Alan November)
  • Literature review: Student-centred schools make the difference (AITSL)
  • Improving Schools: The Prerequisites for Personalizing Learning
  • Personalize your learning environment
  • 10 Trends for Personalized Learning in 2014
  • Creating Learner Centric Environments
  • Uppervention: Meeting the Needs of Gifted and Talented Students
  • 5 Tips For Making Your Class As Addictive As A Game

[Tweet “If you want the new pedagogical approach to succeed you have to shift your entire context about learning”]

0 Comments

Leave Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts
  • Cooperation vs Collaboration School Leadership
  • Part III – A Framework for Developing Teachers
  • Part II – A Framework for Developing Teachers
  • A Framework for Developing Teachers Part I
  • From Vision to Leadership in School
Archives
  • March 2020
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • August 2009

Assessment and Processes to Develop Active Learning: Part II

A key to transforming practice – Spiral vs Linear Learning Part I

Scroll

Where we work

  • We work with schools and organisations across Australia. If you are in WA, VIC, TAS, QLD, SA, NT, NSW or New Zealand we have multiple delivery options available to suit.
  • Are you outside of these locations? Get in touch to discuss how our Bespoke Professional Learning can be applied.

Contact Us

  • Dr Adrian Bertolini - Director of Learning
    Email: adrian@intuyuconsulting.com.au
    Phone: +61 0413 036 382
  • Rachel Manneke-Jones - Office Administration
    E: rachel@intuyuconsulting.com.au
    P: +61 0411 270 277

Stay Connected

SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES

© 2024 Intuyu Consulting Pty Ltd