• PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    • IN SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMS
    • PRINCIPAL AND SCHOOL LEADER DEVELOPMENT
    • MIDDLE LEADERS PROGRAM
  • STEM LEARNING
    • IGNITING STEM LEARNING BOOK – DR ADRIAN BERTOLINI
    • DESIGN YOUR STEM PROGRAMME
  • WEBINARS
    • EVENT CALENDAR
  • WHO WE ARE
  • GET IN TOUCH
  • PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    • IN SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMS
    • PRINCIPAL AND SCHOOL LEADER DEVELOPMENT
    • MIDDLE LEADERS PROGRAM
  • STEM LEARNING
    • IGNITING STEM LEARNING BOOK – DR ADRIAN BERTOLINI
    • DESIGN YOUR STEM PROGRAMME
  • WEBINARS
    • EVENT CALENDAR
  • WHO WE ARE
  • GET IN TOUCH

Why do we have grades?

  • On 11-11-2013

I am current working with quite a prestigious school to transform their Year 8 curriculum and teaching practice such that the learning is not only more engaging but it begins to embed a structure to develop performance oriented independent learners.

As part of the process we were discussing formative assessment and the qualities or attributes of effective formative assessment. At one point I had quite a vigorous discussion with some teachers about the purpose of grading students.

One of the habitual practices I see in high schools is the grading of pieces of work, assignments, tests, etc and they are essentially summative. In other words, a student does a test, assignment, whatever and they are given a mark and that goes towards the result the student achieves for the term or year.

Why?

I asked them, “Why is this the habit you use? What is the purpose of this?” I really want you, as a reader, to think about this too. Why do you grade?

Now I am not against grading as a tool. What I think needs to shift is the context in how we use grades as a tool.

If you look behaviorally at students over time when grades are given they become used as a tool of reward. They are an artificial indication of that the student is doing well (or not), that they can provide what the teacher wants of them (or not). Self-belief and self-confidence rise and fall on the grades. Students adapt so as to get good grades (or give up). Students compare themselves to each other and mindsets are made and embedded. In many high schools I find that one of the clear and constant complaints is that students don’t want to show their working, or demonstrate the process of thinking, they just want the answer and get the grade.

Is this the purpose of schools and learning?

If our job as educators is to be partners to the students to learn then shouldn’t our structures match this desire? Having structures that are supposedly used to measure student understanding yet hinder it seems a bit silly to me.

Wouldn’t it be a good idea if all students could achieve a high grade (90% and above)? Why not let them resubmit an assignment and correct the mistakes they made? Why not have them re-sit the test or exam until they get a good mark? Give the students a choice to keep working until their grade is high and what you start to reward with grades is effort and you build a growth mindset. This is the fundamental thinking of how games work on develop skills and competency (thus the gamification and competency learning movements occurring in learning)

For those students who achieve a high grade quickly, why not have them tutor the other students on their thinking (not the answers) such that everyone can succeed. Not only does this build a community-oriented culture of learning (all for one and one for all), not only does this provide a feedback and coaching structure within the classroom, it addresses the higher competency students to develop their executive functions and be able to explain their thinking to others in such a way that the other students succeed.

And what does Hattie’s meta-analysis say about feedback, micro-teaching, formative evaluation, etc? They are amongst the top approaches to improving student learning.

Shifting one’s context can make a profound difference with little effort or hard work!

0 Comments

Leave Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts
  • Cooperation vs Collaboration School Leadership
  • Part III – A Framework for Developing Teachers
  • Part II – A Framework for Developing Teachers
  • A Framework for Developing Teachers Part I
  • From Vision to Leadership in School
Archives
  • March 2020
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • August 2009

Clarity

Start the Year with Great Habits!

Scroll

Where we work

  • We work with schools and organisations across Australia. If you are in WA, VIC, TAS, QLD, SA, NT, NSW or New Zealand we have multiple delivery options available to suit.
  • Are you outside of these locations? Get in touch to discuss how our Bespoke Professional Learning can be applied.

Contact Us

  • Dr Adrian Bertolini - Director of Learning
    Email: adrian@intuyuconsulting.com.au
    Phone: +61 0413 036 382
  • Rachel Manneke-Jones - Office Administration
    E: rachel@intuyuconsulting.com.au
    P: +61 0411 270 277

Stay Connected

SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES

© 2024 Intuyu Consulting Pty Ltd